I couldn’t understand the difference
in the teacher’s treatment of one child and then
another who had apparently committed the same offence. Let me explain.
I had just witnessed the beginning of
secondary school day.
As each Year 8 youngster came into the classroom
the teacher had a word of friendly enquiry, “How is
the budgie Shaun - is it still sick?” “Did it go
well last night Hamil... was your sister pleased?” “What did your
parents think about the essay then Shane?” Such class
tutors are priceless.
I was left reflecting how OFSTED would put a
value on the way this teacher effortlessly ensured a
really good start to the day, not just for the pupils in
her class but her colleagues who would teach them later. No needless
confrontations for her about disputed late arrivers: her
pupils wanted to arrive in time anyway for what my Irish
relations would call a bit of ‘crack’ and a debate
abut whatever she raised as the issue of the day. Not for her
either a hurried arrival herself, nor a staccato race
through the register. Indeed, she was there before the others and quietly
marking her OMR during her conversation as each arrived. But it was the
combination of two arrivals which made me pause for
thought about equal opportunities.
One of her charges broke the calm by
hurling a bag across the room as he arrived. You know the
scene? A
restraining hand and a quiet but disapproving
conversation later the youngster accepted his punishment
– a detention - without offence. A few minutes
later a similar flying bag from another arriving boy was
treated very differently – a long conversation but no
punishment, just the promise of a longer discussion at
lunchtime when Dean could help the teacher clear a
cupboard. I
enquired about the second miscreant by just asking his
name of the pupil with whom I was sitting. “Oh, Dean’s
all right really. He
has a lot to put up with sir” the girl replied.
When I enquired about the apparent
inconsistency of the teacher, she said that Dean had two
younger sisters and was the person who got them up and
fed them in the morning and that she had spotted Dean
being taunted as he got his younger sisters to primary
school that morning.
There was more to it than that as you might
imagine and at the end of a long catalogue of obstacles
Dean had overcome in his year and a half at secondary
school, the teacher concluded “You never treat kids
the same do you? They
are all different and they all deserve an equal chance
in life. So
that means people like me fitting what you do so that
the Deans of the world get that chance”.
Her conversation reminded me of how in
schools at peace with themselves staff do not question
apparent inconsistencies in the Heads’ or Deputies’
treatment of offending pupils committing similar
offences and referred for punishment. “She must have
good reason: she must know something more about it”
was the vote of confidence one Head received but never
knew about from a young member of staff who had referred
a problem pupil.
At the heart of equal opportunity in
schools, as distinct from other places, is this eternal
dilemma of the teacher - knowing you need to make minute
by minute judgements about how to interpret pupils’
behaviour, conscious always that you must treat pupils
as they might become rather than as they infuriatingly
are. Equal
opportunity is a challenge because children arrive at
school with such different - and sometimes difficult to
identify - barriers to their learning. And it is our
job to help them overcome them.
In Birmingham a combination of history
and the present environment makes the achievement of
equal opportunity goals in school the more hard won, but
also the more valuable.
Disability, gender and race are often, for
convenience, tackled separately though they are closely
related. In
Birmingham religion is an issue too. (What must it
feel like for example to be one of the 20% of Muslims in
our schools and wonder why Catholics, Anglicans and Jews
can attend ‘aided’ schools yet they have little
prospect of doing so?)
Employment practices are of course
crucial. Nearly
all our schools now monitor applications, shortlists and
appointments for race and gender. And they
celebrate successful senior appointments – still
desperately few in number - that reflect the success of
that policy in practice.
But some schools do not stop there in their quest
for positive role models.
The KWESI initiative shows how ‘mentoring’ is
a powerful and immediate means of overcoming
stereotypes. So
many schools now see ‘mentoring’ anyway as a means
of raising individual achievement so they take the
chance to use time twice.
Disability however - why is it race and
gender, but disability, but not ability? - remains the
Cinderella of equal opportunities so far as priority and
attention are concerned.
For one thing it is so difficult to find role
models among staff.
People can and do hide difficulties in a way
which is clearly not possible in the other cases! Leaving for
health reasons moreover is the immediate thought for any
one of us suddenly aware that we can no longer work in
the way we have before, or to the same extent. Even though
Birmingham is one of the few authorities to earmark
funds to help staff, including teachers, accommodate to
disability by supplying extra resource in equipment or
staff to overcome barriers, few take advantage of it. Perhaps it is
that disability encountered later in life, especially in
the energy demanding atmosphere of school, is of a
different order than living with disability from birth. Perhaps it is
ignorance of what is available. Whatever it is,
it is unusual to encounter a disabled teacher as a role
model.
Karen McLean is therefore a rare
example of someone with disability in a mainstream
setting. She runs a unit for the visually impaired in a
north Birmingham secondary school. She is a living
example of dedication and no-nonsense determination. Registered blind she has lived both as learner and
later as teacher in two worlds - in the separate
environment of the special school as well as in the
mainstream, in the special interest voluntary group and
in her local community.
For some years she worked with the peripatetic
team in providing services to the visually impaired, but
in the end found the time and difficulty of travel too
much. From
all this and bruising encounters with ignorance and
prejudice, Karen emerges as someone determined to ensure
that the children in her unit will have a better chance
than she has had of living as full a life as possible. She picks up
clues from shape and sound and she relies on others -
“as we all do” is how she puts it - to fill in the
gaps. Naturally
for her particular world she takes enormous heart from
the example of David Blunkett … but the contradictions show through
when she settles as her ambition “to run a special
school for the blind …
perhaps one of my children will be Head of a mainstream
school. Society
is not ready for that yet. David Blunkett
is Secretary of State for Education, but a blind Head of
a comprehensive school . . . . . . .”
A very experienced and skillful teacher
summed up equal opportunity for me when she said that
for her in the end it came down to bullying and
monitoring. When
I asked her to explain she went on, “Well you see I
have never worked anywhere where bullying was not a
problem. And bullying
creates all those barriers, especially for the most
vunerable. Bullying is the enemy of anyone’s learning and
fulfilment. So
we must always seek to eliminate it - in the home, in
the street, in the playground, in the classroom and,”
she added smiling, “in the staffroom. Schools need not
just bullying policies, they need a range of practices
that make bullying less likely
and they need to monitor incidents of
bullying and seek to change practices to reduce the
incidents”.
I did not need to ask about monitoring. We have no
evidence without monitoring. So we know young
people of African Caribbean, Pakistani and Bangladeshi
background do not do as well as they should from the
schooling system. Nor
do males. And
if you really want to pile on the disadvantage and
barrier to successful learning, be all of that and in
the care of the local authority.
So, I am glad I encountered that young
class tutor and Karen McLean. They shall stand
as proxy for all our determination to make life fairer.
December 1995.